Posts Tagged ‘McCain’

‘Tis the Season… For Dealing with Religious Family

Tuesday, December 23rd, 2008

If your family is anything like mine, this holiday season will be full of love, laughter, cherished memories, right-wing rhetoric, companionship, good food, Obama bashing, funny stories, songs, games, and more religious references and complaints about the “War on Christmas” than a Fox News holiday special.  I know there are a lot of people out there like me, lone dissenters in families full of religious conservatives, and I know what a delicate and taxing balancing act it can be.  When in one moment Grandma is hugging you and telling you how much she loves you, and in the next she is declaring that killing all the Muslims will solve all of the world’s problems, it can make for a bumpy ride.  When your uncle is jovially telling you about the latest happenings in his life, and all you can think about is the tens of thousands of dollars he donated to the Pro-Prop 8 campaign, it can be really hard to separate the person you love from the actions and beliefs you find completely heinous.  In those inevitable moments in between the happy times, where ideas clash, it can be an extremely difficult task to find the right balance between keeping the peace and standing up for oneself.  Although every family is different and there isn’t one all-encompassing way of coping, here are a few things I’ve learned that have helped me to enjoy the time I spend with my family a lot more.

Arm yourself with Knowledge

In my opinion, this is one of the most important things we can do to assist us in our dealings, not just with family, but in all aspects of our lives. We don’t have to (and can’t possibly) know everything, but if we’re going to make a point, we ought to have some idea of what we’re talking about.  We sometimes clam up rather than speak up (I know I’ve been guilty of it) when someone says something that sounds really off-base, but we don’t feel like we have the appropriate language or the breadth of knowledge necessary to articulate an argument against it.  And the ironic part is, oftentimes the person speaking has even less of an idea what he or she is talking about than we do.  People love to sound smart, and they’ll often regurgitate something they heard or read somewhere to try to appear to be an expert, even though they actually know very little about the matter.  The best thing to do in these situations is ask questions.  Ask for clarification.  Root out the logic of the subject.  Make a point to research it later.  Take an interest in our world, in issues of culture, society, government, science, economics, religion, etc.  Read and learn and absorb as much information as you can.  Not only will you have something valid to contribute to conversations and be better equipped for sniffing out misinformation, but you’ll be much more likely to actually enjoy these conversations and be able to view them as an exchange of ideas, rather than feeling inadequate and frustrated and trampled upon.

Keep your Cool

I know it’s easier said than done, especially when we care deeply and passionately about certain issues, but it’s important to take the high road and keep a calm demeanor if we want to be taken seriously.  With the right attitude and approach, a mud-slinging session can be turned into a healthy debate and a good learning experience.  When we lose our cool, we’ve essentially conceded to the other person, because we’ve sunken to a level of disrespect and bad form.  A big part of how we are perceived is not just what we say, but how we say it.  If we get defensive, even if we’re making the more logical arguments, it can sometimes appear to the other person that he or she has “gotten to us.”

Pick your Battles

I have one family member who often makes comments for no other reason than to try to get a rise out of me.  And when that person succeeds, I’m the only one who ends up looking foolish.  It’s not necessary to challenge every single thing we disagree with.  In some families, that would mean there would be nothing but constant arguing.  It’s sometimes worth it to let a comment slide here and there, when correcting or challenging the person has no foreseeable positive outcome. Additionally, although our words can sometimes have an impact, in reality, the arguments we make are typically not going to change anyone’s mind, much less change the world.  Don’t place too much pressure on any one situation. 

Consider the Big Picture

One way to consider the big picture is from the inside looking out.  It’s best to focus on the person we are talking to and listen to his or her individual arguments, rather than consider that person to be the sole representative of an entire group.  Just because your grandparents may have named their new cats McCain and Palin, it doesn’t mean your grandparents are McCain and Palin and represent every idea and policy they stand for.  Keep an open mind and don’t assume anyone’s opinions on the issues.  Approach each subject and each person as an individual piece of the pie. 

The other way to consider the big picture is from the outside looking in, quite literally.  There are usually more people present during a discussion than the actual participants, so even if what we are saying doesn’t seem to be getting through to the person we are saying it to, there may be other people listening in who have heard and understood us.  So, when you get stuck arguing with a brick wall, don’t lose hope that you’ve lost your chance of making a point.  Someone seemingly uninvolved may have walked away with a little bit of insight.

Find an Outlet

We all want to express ourselves and be heard, and that can be one of the most frustrating aspects of being the only member of a family who sees the world very differently than we do.  The rest of the family get to express themselves freely and frequently with the comfort and assuredness that they will be supported and agreed with, whereas nearly anything a nonconformist wishes to express involves standing alone against a crowd of opposition.  Even when we do get a chance to air our ideas, it’s rarely possible for us to say everything we want to say in a situation, given the nature of discussion.  Perhaps we run out of time or the conversation flows in a different direction and we lose our chance.  Perhaps what we want to say would offend everyone in the room, so we refrain.  Perhaps we have one of those midnight moments when we think of the perfect retort to an earlier comment, but it’s far too late to use it.  Rather than let those unsaid things bottle up inside of us, it helps a lot to find some way of letting them out.  Whether through written words, music, poetry, art, or even simple discussion with likeminded people, it can relieve stress and improve our sense of well-being when we release our ideas into the world in various ways.

For all you other “black sheep” out there, I hope you can get the most out of the time you spend with your families this year and truly enjoy the holidays together.  Let’s let reason be the reason for the season!  

-Laura

The Trend of Obama Doubt

Thursday, December 18th, 2008

Is he merely catering to the small minority of Christian fundamentalist fanatics whom he threatens to depose by his mere accession to the presidential seat? Is he secretly homophobic? Is this subtle humor to show us what life would have been like under a McCain/Palin administration? Did all the hundreds of other potential choices have something scheduled on January 20th? Or was Obama just not thinking straight when he decided to invite the notorious fundamentalist homophobe Rick Warren to offer an inaugural prayer next month?

Yes, this is what everyone is jabbering about right now. Oh my God, you picked Rick Warren!?!?! Out of all the people! Well, I was jabbering, among a few others, about Obama’s pro-Christian, to the point of making me nervous about him, attitude way back in July, when I wrote “Thank God Obama Worships the “Right” God.” I mentioned that in light of rumors that Obama was Muslim, because he had attended a Muslim school for a short time as a child, Obama’s “Factcheck” web page, devoted to quelling such rumors, spent an inordinate amount of space not only just simply denying Obama’s Muslimhood, but also wildly exaggerating Obama’s Christianity. I was worried that what appeared to be wild exaggeration was actually a sign that Obama was a closet fundamentalist, or at least has a strong preference for the Christian religion and beliefs. My examination of the statements he’s made to that effect in the past, coupled with his selection of Rick Warren, have solidified my doubts about his demeanor with regard to Christian partisanship.

Regarding Warren, vjack at Atheist Revolution sums the pastor up nicely:

-Warren supported the ban on gay marriage in California.
-Warren opposes reproductive rights.
-Warren is clearly outside mainstream America and has been compared, fairly I believe, to James Dobson. Hell, he’s compared himself to Dobson!1

Now, we probably shouldn’t jump on the guilt by association bandwagon (as Obama’s opponents were wont to do during the election), but there are significantly safer, more neutral, and more politically correct (forgive me) selections for an inaugural companion. And this news of the Warren selection is right on the heels of other questionable behavior by Obama — notably, his cabinet choices. Having a cabinet and set of advisors that even Cheney agrees with should send up little red flags all over America.

Someone should ask Obama about what part of “change” we must have misunderstood. Is this country about to be run by the old administration in sheep’s clothing? Instead, how about… A bit of change away from the status quo of treating Christians and most other mainstream religions with preference; a change away from the Bush Doctrine; a change away from civil rights destruction (including the Patriot Act and its relatives); a change away from arbitrary discrimination in the guise of morality, promoted and perpetuated by religious groups; a change from the useless war on drugs (that ends up leaving the U.S. with the highest ratio of inmates in the entire world); a change from sexual discrimination in every form; a change away from criminalization of that which does not hurt, but is criminalized solely because of puritan influence; a change from pointless wars or wars fought for oil, or dominance, or whatever; a change from homophobia and the perpetuation of tradition that used to sit comfortably next to slavery and treating women as chattel. This isn’t change for the sake of change. It’s a change to improve our lives, get us out from under the foot of oppression, and help make this entire world more livable and, gods forbid, lovable.

Where’s that change, Obama? I don’t see it. I see, again, falling in line.

-Procrustes (pissed)

Who else has something to say about this issue?

Christopher Hitchens, at Slate, says we can do much better than Warren. If we must have an officiating priest.

Rob Boston at the AU Blog says that although Warren poses as a moderate, he’s really just another Falwell wannabee.

Vjack, as mentioned above, has a few things to say, including the wise advice to not sweep this one under the rug. He’s also indirectly supplied me with a few of these links to other articles, as well as bringing to my attention the contact information for Obama’s team.

The Atheist Experience is calling this Obama’s first big screwup.

Pam Spaulding, at Pam’s House Blend, suggests that although it’s a good idea to let the Obama camp know how we feel about this issue, it’s unlikely to be reversed.

Dave Silverman, at American Atheists, reminds Obama that he’s supposed to be a Democrat. (however, I say, look at the behavior of the rest of the self-proclaimed Democrats in Congress)

Bligbi nails the point in that by choosing Warren, Obama is making the pastor his representative. And, better yet, calls Obama out on his claim to be a fierce advocate of the LGBT community.

CNN has an interview of Rick Warren by Kiran Chetry.

Greta Christina (recently featured at BoingBoing) worries that Obama just wants everyone to like him, and in his attempt to eschew intolerance, he will become too tolerant.

Daily Kos acknowledges that there may be a silver lining in all this — that Obama will now be forced to continue to affirm his stance of equality with regard to LGBT rights.

Olbermann on Warren:



Rachel Maddow:



More to follow soon, as the theatrics roll.

StOP

  1. http://www.atheistrev.com/2008/12/obamas-inaugural-blunder-rick-warren.html [<]

State of Christmas

Tuesday, December 2nd, 2008

I don’t care what you call it.

I don’t care if you’ve claimed it as your own, despite its history saying otherwise.

I don’t care if you decorate your house with nativity scenes, giant glowing plastic Santas, or wreathes of plastic holly.

I don’t care if you don’t care that I don’t care, and then you go light your Menorah.

I don’t care if you advertise using the name.

I don’t care if you make movies with the name.

I don’t care if you go around telling everyone that the whole point of it all is to acknowledge the birth of some desert child thousands of years ago.

I don’t care if you go to parties dressed up as Santa (or an elf), and get offended by the guy who dresses up as Jesus.

I don’t care if you tell your kids that Santa is real. I don’t care if you tell your kids that Jesus or the Easter Bunny or Optimus Prime or John McCain are real. (but just please try to refrain from condemning your kids to hell)

I don’t care if you buy and expect gifts. I don’t care if you don’t buy, but expect gifts. I don’t care if you don’t buy and you don’t expect gifts.

I don’t care if you’re offended by my apathy.

I don’t care if you think you have some sort of legal right to be offended by my apathy.

So, what do I care about?

This little, oft-ignored phrase:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…

Two things. No establishment and no prohibition. By taking actions that value any religious belief (not just above others, but at all), the government is respecting an establishment of religion. By investing in any religion, or religion itself, the government works (by exclusion) to prevent me from freely exercising my choice not to subscribe to that religion or to religion itself.

It’s not just Christmas, it’s anything and everything. When I’m asked to “respect” someone else’s religious beliefs, I answer NO. Absolutely not. I don’t respect the utter inanity religion ultimately brings, and I don’t have to. But more to the point, my government not only does not have to respect religious belief, but it is also tasked with explicitly not respecting religion.

So, religious people, stop trying to convince others that this nation was founded as a Christian nation, or a nation otherwise religious. Its people may be religious, but the government is not, and the establishment of this nation was explicitly godless. Saying otherwise is a prevarication worthy of condemnation.

Also, stop trying to push religion into public schools, courtrooms, legislatures, and other public arenas. Remember when I said I didn’t care what you did privately (as long as it’s not causing actual harm)? Go ahead and believe whatever you want, whenever you want, however you want, but don’t use your beliefs as an excuse to impose those beliefs on me or anyone else. I prohibit it, and so does the Constitution of the United States.

StOP

DC Metro Bus Anti-God Campaign Watch

Monday, December 1st, 2008

I’m “in” DC, and very interested in the development of the DC Metro bus ad campaign (reminiscent of the London bus “no god” ad slogans in October) by the American Humanist Association, which, according to the Association’s press release, “will raise public awareness of humanism as well as controversy over humanist ideas.”

Why Believe?
“Why believe in a god? Just be good for goodness’ sake.”

In order to help readers keep tabs on this historic event, State of Protest will be monitoring the news and the blogosphere for related articles. Keep an eye out here for interesting developments.

I’m also going to try to get some pics and video of the actual buses, as well as some on-the-street interviews with observers.

American Humanist press release: Humanists Launch Godless Holiday Campaign

News

MyFox DC: “Why Believe in a god” Ads on Metro Draw Scorn
(Apparently the local Fox station in DC likes to delete all of its old or controversial web articles, so I apologize for this link no longer working. I haven’t been able to find the full article anywhere else thus far.)

CNN: Group’s New Christmas Message: Be good, not godly(this URL has been removed from CNN. It referred to the AH press release)

ABC: God Humbug: Humanist Holiday Ads Say Just Be Good

Nov 12 – FoxNews: “Why Believe in a God?” Ad Campaign Launches on D.C. Buses

More Fox News (again, deleted by MyFoxDC, the DC Fox News station), plus silly comments like “Lots of people are going to have a funny look on their faces, when they find out that God is real. Especially when they are falling into the fires of Hell.”

Blogs

(Related): Joystiq.com: Fallout 3 ads criticized by Washington D.C. metro rider

American Atheists: It Begins: Godless Ads
(if you get a 403 error, just click through — trying to get in touch with the owner to fix this [if you're out there, contact me!])

Ex-Christian.net

Oz Atheist’s Weblog

Pharyngula (PZ Myers)

Rant & Reason: Blog of the Humanist Magazine

ReligionBlog (at DallasNews)

If you have others to suggest, please link them in the comments. Thanks!

UPDATES:

12-01 – On the metro train this morning, I saw one of the campaign posters in a corner of the train. By the time I saw, it, it was my stop, so I wasn’t able to take a photo of it, but I did notice that absolutely no one was looking at it, gawking, or whatever. I think people generally ignore ads in the metro, but I would have liked to have been able to interview someone about it. Now that I know the posters are in the trains as well as on the buses, I’ll be more on the lookout. More soon! And happy Thanksgiving!

12-02 – According to the DC Examiner (the free DC local newspaper that endorsed John McCain), there have been 251 complaints so far about the metro ads, and only one compliment. 1
Although the ACLU stated that it would defend the First Amendment right of the American Humanist Association to post ads, even if others find them offensive (because no one has the right not to be offended), complainants have still contended that the ads are offensive, because they question the existence of God — “That ad is obscene to me!? I wouldn’t want my children reading that,” wrote one.

If you’d like to compliment or complain about Metro, click HERE. (they call compliments “commendations”). Other contact info for Metro can be found HERE.

Here’s my commendation:

Please accept my thanks for granting equal opportunity to both the religious and non-religious advertisers. I ride the metro daily, and it’s nice to see that Metro hasn’t stifled the speech of any side, and has played fair, despite controversy.

Also, if you could get the escalators working, that’d be great, too.

Update 12-15-2008

Read my criticism of the counter-ads.

  1. Thanks to pstryder for the link on Reddit’s atheism sub-Reddit. http://www.dcexaminer.com/local/120308_Metro_fields_hundreds_of_complaints_about_bus_ads.html [<]

DEWEY BEATS TRUMAN! (or Obama beats McCain?)

Tuesday, November 4th, 2008

It almost seems untrue.

But will it matter? What a legacy to inherit.

Fortunately, no matter what happens now, Obama will set a precedent that may very well change the tide of a traditionally racist and sexist nation. (You think I’m joking about racism and sexism, check out my prior posts, and maybe some U.S. history).

Regardless, Obama ran an outstanding race. Congratulations.

(Except for the request to God to bless America and whatnot. You were fine up to “Thank you.” You know, when you thank the gays for voting for you, but then follow your speech up with an invocation to the very same god that you indirectly, and others directly use to condemn personal sexual choice, you become a hypocrite. You’re better than McCain in a lot of ways, and way better than Palin, but by believing what you do, openly and publicly, you have condemned all the non-believers to hell. Every time you invoke the name of your Christian God, you do so, and every time you do, I am reminded of how we’re considered non-citizens, ill-respected, and ignored. You’re welcome for your votes, but, fuck you for your religious beliefs, Obama. Of course, you couldn’t have won without them, so fuck all the rest of you religious nuts, too. Good night, and remember that you’re all fucking worm food.)1

-Procrustes

  1. Okay, fine. Perhaps I’m being too extreme or hyperbolic here. Perhaps his “invocation” of God is no more genuine than an average church-goer’s “Bless You” to a random sneezer. Perhaps it’s less. Perhaps it’s all just a big game. As my friend Onesimus says, quite rightly, what’s more important is that he brings the troops home. As long as he does that, says Ony, who cares if Obama worships pink trees? Well, that’s a tough one. If you have an effective leader who is delusional, but in a way that’s not detrimental to others who don’t share that delusion, is that leader desirable? I guess so. If that’s the case, and I think it probably is (since I fucking loved Obama’s speech up to the God point), then I welcome Obama in open arms (I did anyway, I was just being obtuse up there), but I think he should eventually nix the church tax exemption. Then I’d even go so far as to like him. (Yes, I did get teary-eyed near the end of Obama’s speech. Sue me.) [<]