Posts Tagged ‘Illinois’

Atheism, a Positive Pillar

Wednesday, December 3rd, 2008

In this article Atheism, a Positive Pillar by Tom Krattenmaker, the idea is explored that in the future, declaring yourself an atheist might not be committing political suicide.

It’s not easy not believing in God in the USA. That’s why a group of non-believers is trying to shed the strident image of past atheists by promoting a better side of those sitting on religion’s sidelines.

Being an atheist is not easy in this age of great public religiosity in America. Not when the overwhelming majority of Americans profess some form of belief in God. Not when many believers equate non-belief with immorality. Not when more people would automatically disqualify an atheist for the presidency (53%, according to a USA TODAY/Gallup Poll) than a gay candidate (43%), for example, or a Mormon (24%).

Anti-atheism might have found its ugliest public expression during an episode in the Illinois Legislature this spring. As atheist activist Rob Sherman attempted to testify against a $1 million state grant to a church, Rep. Monique Davis railed, “This is the Land of Lincoln where people believe in God, where people believe in protecting their children. … It’s dangerous for our children to even know that your philosophy exists! … You have no right to be here! We believe in something. You believe in destroying!”

Lest we dismiss the legislator’s harangue as an anomaly, consider the organizations that bar atheists from membership — the Boy Scouts of America and American Legion, to name two, as well as some local posts of the Veterans of Foreign Wars — and the conspicuous absence of openly atheist politicians on the national stage.

Mindful of atheism’s reviled reputation, a new current in non-belief is intent on showing the public what atheists are for. You might be surprised by what’s on their short list. Because, save for the belief-in-a-deity part, it sounds a lot like what most Americans value. Care for one’s community and fellow human beings, love of country and cherished American principles, the pursuit and expansion of knowledge — these are the elements of the new “positive atheism.

Read the full article here

-HAL

Please Visit the Atheist Think Tank

Thank God Obama Worships the “Right” God

Friday, July 4th, 2008

One of Barack Obama’s Factcheck web pages is devoted to disclaiming any and all rumors that Obama is Muslim.1 Obviously it’s critical for a presidential candidate to dispel the kinds of accusations that would negatively impact a campaign. Obama, however, doesn’t stop with quashing rumor — he devotes a tremendous amount of time and effort swinging the religious pendulum hard in the opposite direction. That direction is Christianity, presumably because while being accused of worshipping a single creator god (from one particular origin) is heinous, bragging about worshipping a single creator god (from a different, but related origin) is not only perfectly acceptable, but also a key component required to obtain the U.S. presidency.

Examine the fear-tinged rejections of Islam, on Obama’s web page, compared to the praises of Obama’s fealty to Jesus Christ: (all quotes from the footnoted website; emphasis mine)

Obama Has Never Been A Muslim, And Is a Committed Christian

OBAMA IS NOT AND HAS NEVER BEEN A MUSLIM

Obama Spokesman Robert Gibbs Issued A Statement Explaining That “Senator Obama Has Never Been A Muslim, Was Not Raised As A Muslim, And Is A Committed Christian.” “Obama’s campaign aides have emphasized his strong Christian beliefs and downplayed any Islamic connection. The Illinois senator was raised ‘in a secular household in Indonesia by his stepfather and mother,’ his chief spokesman, Robert Gibbs, said in a statement in January after false reports began circulating that Obama had attended a radical madrasa, or Koranic school, as a child. ‘To be clear, Senator Obama has never been a Muslim, was not raised a Muslim, and is a committed Christian who attends the United Church of Christ in Chicago,’ Gibbs’ Jan. 24 statement said.” [Los Angeles Times, 3/16/07]

Obama “Beckoning” Felt At Trinity United Church Of Christ, “Submitted Myself To His Will, And Dedicated Myself To Discovering His Truth And Carrying Out His Works.” Obama said, “So one Sunday, I put on one of the few clean jackets I had, and went over to Trinity United Church of Christ on 95th Street on the South Side of Chicago. And I heard Reverend Jeremiah A. Wright deliver a sermon called “The Audacity of Hope.” And during the course of that sermon, he introduced me to someone named Jesus Christ. I learned that my sins could be redeemed. I learned that those things I was too weak to accomplish myself, He would accomplish with me if I placed my trust in Him. And in time, I came to see faith as more than just a comfort to the weary or a hedge against death, but rather as an active, palpable agent in the world and in my own life. It was because of these newfound understandings that I was finally able to walk down the aisle of Trinity one day and affirm my Christian faith. It came about as a choice, and not an epiphany. I didn’t fall out in church, as folks sometimes do. The questions I had didn’t magically disappear. The skeptical bent of my mind didn’t suddenly vanish. But kneeling beneath that cross on the South Side, I felt I heard God’s spirit beckoning me. I submitted myself to His will, and dedicated myself to discovering His truth and carrying out His works.” [Speech, 6/23/07]

Barack Obama Is Not and Has Never Been a Muslim. Obama never prayed in a mosque. He has never been a Muslim, was not raised a Muslim, and is a committed Christian who attends the United Church of Christ.

HE NEVER ATTENDED A RADICAL MUSLIM SCHOOL

CNN Reporter: I’ve Been to Madrassas in Pakistan and Afghanistan, and Obama’s Indonesian Elementary School Is Nothing Like That. On January 22, CNN Reporter John Vause reported, “I came here to Barack Obama’s elementary school in Jakarta, looking for what some are calling an Islamic Madrassa, like the ones that teach hate and violence in Pakistan and Afghanistan.. I’ve been to those Madrassas in Pakistan and Wolf, this school is nothing like that.” [CNN, Situation Room, 1/22/07]

What if he had attended a radical Catholic school? I know a number of Catholics who would argue that their Catholic school and upbringing was radical. Would that exempt him from the presidential race, or would it enhance his chances at winning?

OBAMA IS A PRACTICING CHRISTIAN

Obama Has Been A Member Of Trinity United Church Of Christ For Twenty Years. Monroe Anderson stands up for Reverend Wright’s ministry, “For the past two decades, Barack Obama has been a faithful member of the congregation at Chicago’s Trinity United Church of Christ.” [Chicago Sun-Times, Monroe Anderson, 3/25/07]

Obama Was Baptized And Attends Church Once a Week When He is Able. In the Audacity of Hope, Obama wrote, “I was finally able to walk down the aisle of Trinity United Church of Christ one day and be baptized.” In 2004, he “attend[ed] the 11 a.m. Sunday service at Trinity in the Brainerd neighborhood every week — or at least as many weeks as he is able. His pastor, Wright, has become a close confidant.” When asked about his decision to be baptized, Obama said “Kneeling beneath that cross on the South Side of Chicago, I felt I heard God’s spirit beckoning me,” he said of his walk down the aisle of the Trinity United Church of Christ. “I submitted myself to his will and dedicated myself to discovering his truth.” [Audacity of Hope, p.208, Chicago Sun Times, 4/5/04; AP 6/28/06]

Obama Reads The Bible, Finds Time to Pray On Campaign Trail. The Chicago Sun-Times wrote, “Obama says he reads the Bible, though not as regularly as he’d like, now that he’s on the campaign trail. But he does find time to pray. ‘It’s not formal, me getting on my knees,’ he says. ‘I think I have an ongoing conversation with God… I’m constantly asking myself questions about what I’m doing, why I am doing it.’” [Chicago Sun Times, 4/5/04]

Obama Held His Personal Bible When He Was Sworn-In As A U.S. Senator. “…Even before the makeshift office was up and running in the basement of a Senate building, even before he raised his hand Tuesday to take the oath of office as the junior senator from Illinois, Barack Obama was already a political rock star and a celebrated new face in Congress. He arrived Tuesday, his first official day in the Capitol…. In the circles he runs in now, celebrity status is checked at the cloakroom door…When it was finally time to take the oath, he held his personal Bible, as family from as far away as Kenya watched from the visitors’ gallery above. His daughters, Malia, 6, and Sasha, 3, in velvet dresses and patent leather shoes, bounced in their chairs when he looked up and waved.” [Los Angeles Times, 1/5/05]

Questions, Mr. Obama: What does the Bible actually say? Why do you read it? Why did you hold a bible when you were sworn in? (I thought our government was secular). Why are you using that fact as a positive indicator of your ability to run this country? What does the Bible say about slavery, Mr. Obama? Are you going to have a copy of the “Ten Commandments” placed on display in the White House? Could you make an executive decision that you think goes against “God’s will”? What is God’s will with regard to non-believers? That’s in the Bible, right? Why read the Bible, profess worship for the alleged dictator of that work, and then not actually follow the clear commands within it? Do you, Mr. Obama, know what the punishments for violating the Ten Commandments are? Would you enforce them while holding the presidential office? If not, why devote so much time and energy to show the citizenry of the U.S. that you are a faithful Christian, follower of Jesus, and worshiper of the Christian God, to whom you have “submitted” your “will”?

Ah, here are some answers:

TRINITY TENETS ARE “TAKEN DIRECTLY FROM SCRIPTURE” AND EMPHASIZE “COMMITMENT” TO GOD, COMMUNITY, FAMILY, WORK, SELF-DISCIPLINE AND SELF-RESPECT

Obama Says Black Values System Must Be Understood as a Whole. “Obama said it was important to understand the document as a whole rather than highlight individual tenets. ‘Commitment to God, black community, commitment to the black family, the black work ethic, self-discipline and self-respect,’ he said. ‘Those are values that the conservative movement in particular has suggested are necessary for black advancement…So I would be puzzled that they would object or quibble with the bulk of a document that basically espouses profoundly conservative values of self-reliance and self-help.’” [Chicago Tribune, 2/6/07]

Obama Says Argument Against “Middleclassness” Taken Directly From Scripture. “In his published memoirs, Obama said even he was stopped by Trinity’s tenet to disavow “middleclassness” when he first read it two decades ago in a church pamphlet. The brochure implored upwardly mobile church members not to distance themselves from less fortunate Trinity worshipers. ‘As I read it, at least, it was a very simple argument taken directly from Scripture: ‘To whom much is given much is required,” Obama said. [Chicago Tribune, 2/6/07]

Wait, those aren’t answers. Has anyone asked Senator Obama the kinds of questions I posed? Or even come close? Why does the nation think it’s unimportant to ask such questions? Is it fear of reprisal? Is it that everyone who could possibly ask such questions is prevented from doing so? Where are questions like that in formal debates? Doesn’t the Muslim American community have an interest in asking these questions? What about the Buddhists, the Hindus, the deists, the other Christian sects, the undecided? There’s quite a large chunk of this nation that does not represent a Christian population. Why do we consistently throw softball questions at candidates? Why do we, by default, accept the status quo that “Christian” means “good”? Obama says he’s for change. I believe it, but regarding religion and the way Christianity is put on a pedestal in the United States, I believe he’s for perpetuation.

  1. http://www.barackobama.com/factcheck/2007/11/12/obama_has_never_been_a_muslim_1.php [<]

What First Amendment?

Friday, November 16th, 2007

Sometimes I wish my kid would start a pro-transvestite anarchist atheist socialist anti-censorship club at his school. Just so I could watch the religious right-based school board members writhe in their plush seats as I defended my son’s right to establish such a student group in a public school presumably so unbiased that it would allow an antiabortion religious group. Unfortunately, what I really envision is them sitting there with smug looks of self-righteousness reminiscent of the Joe McCarthy witch hunts of the 40’s and 50’s. Honestly, I don’t mind if kids want to set up an antiabortion student club. More power to them. If a school board, on the other hand, insisted on having one, that might be a different story. What’s truly disturbing, though, is that a school board would probably find some sort of justification for prohibiting my son’s hypothetical student group, despite allowing a group that is self-admittedly religiously based. Perhaps the school boards across the nation have an idea of what is right and wrong for their schools based not on the secular governmental positions they hold, but, instead, on their own religious idealism. I think the facts tend to speak for themselves. You decide.

The United States was created and continues to be governed by a document called the U.S. Constitution. Shortly after its adoption, amendments were added to ensure further protection from the government of the citizens of the nation. The first ten amendments are commonly referred to as the Bill of Rights.

The First Amendment states:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.1

There have been a number of court cases involving to what extent this prohibition against establishment and the protection of free exercise applies in a public school setting. Most recently, an Illinois U.S. District Judge, Robert Gettleman, issued a preliminary injunction against The Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act of Illinois, citing its vagueness and probable unconstitutionality, as a result of a lawsuit brought by concerned parent Rob Sherman.2

The law states, in part:

In each public school classroom the teacher in charge shall observe a brief period of silence with the participation of all the pupils therein assembled at the opening of every school day. This period shall not be conducted as a religious exercise but shall be an opportunity for silent prayer or for silent reflection on the anticipated activities of the day.3

[the initial "shall" was originally "may" until recently amended]4

Judge Gettleman stated that the statute’s language would indicate to a child that the child must think about praying.5 Although the case is still early on in its likely prolonged history, especially if there are appeals made and the Illinois state Attorney General decides to get involved, it is an example of how the court system takes very seriously the First Amendment, and attempts to side, by default, with the amendment’s distinct separation of church and state.

However, some school administrative bodies have lately not been so adherent to the edicts of the Constitution. Or, at minimum, have not been consistent in application of prohibitions against school activities. For example, in early November, a teenager fought and won a fight to establish an after-school antiabortion club that is specifically and openly based on a religious agenda. The purpose of the club, as stated, is:

To educate people about the biggest holocaust that is going on right here in the United States. To come together and pray to end abortion. To be a voice for my generation and a voice for those who cannot speak for themselves.6

But, as a Defense Fund attorney insisted:

There is a discomfort with religious speech in the schools, even when it’s engaged in by students, which should not be the case. Once they open up the facility to clubs, merely . . . allowing a religious club in the mix does not promote religion.7

Whether or not by allowing such a club, a school is endorsing or establishing religion, there should at least be some consistency in such decisions by the governmental organizations that closely control the curricula of public school systems. Unfortunately, that appears not to be the case at all. A Florida school board has been the subject of a lawsuit by a student group, titled the “Gay-Straight Alliance” which was a result of the school board insisting that the after-school club change its name, lest it violate a Florida law requiring schools to teach abstinence and “heterosexual marriage.”8

What is happening here is that a school board is using an obviously biased, discriminatory, religious-based, and unconstitutional law to justify a decision about the name and activities of an after-school student organization. Could it genuinely be a conflict between the desire of the school board to facilitate student activities and the board’s fear of reprisal by the state for not conforming to its law? Possibly. But compare this situation with the after-school antiabortion club, and that school board’s ease of acceptance, despite the possible unconstitutionality of the establishment of such a group.

If one school board could be so lenient in favor of a religious student organization, why can’t another school board be just as accepting of an organization that is not only not religious, but potentially pro-secular? It’s quite likely that both school boards and the state governments in which they reside are biased toward pro-religious organizations, and will find a way to accept them, while rejecting those that potentially threaten their religious beliefs, at least until a concerned atheist activist parent, like Rob Sherman, brings a lawsuit against the school board, and a rational judge like Judge Gettleman challenges the status quo by actually trying to enforce protections provided by the Constitution and the First Amendment. What this nation needs is more Rob Shermans and more Judge Gettlemans.

-Procrustes

  1. U.S. Constitution [<]
  2. Judge bans moment of silence in suburban district, Chicago Tribune, November 14, 2007 [<]
  3. The Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act [<]
  4. The Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act [<]
  5. Judge bans moment of silence in suburban district, Chicago Tribune, November 14, 2007 [<]
  6. Teen Wins Fight for Antiabortion Club at School, WashingtonPost.com, November 6, 2007 [<]
  7. Teen Wins Fight for Antiabortion Club at School, WashingtonPost.com, November 6, 2007 [<]
  8. H.S. gay club rejects name change, United Press International, November 15, 2007 [<]