Skip to content


Sotomayor Evades “Landscaping” Query

Washington – High court nominee doesn’t chafe, even when the heat is on.

Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor dodged volleys of trimming and waxing questions from senators Wednesday, keeping her demeanor cool and not revealing too much about her personal grooming habits as she neared the end of a marathon grilling on her hot coal walk to confirmation.

After more than 10 hours of questioning by Judiciary Committee senators over two days, Sotomayor had yet to slip up, but supporters feared that Wednesday’s pointed questions, some delicately asked, and some blazingly straightforward, would offer the opportunity for Republicans to derail her nomination.

Republican senator Jeff Sessions of Alabama was the most prominent of the Judiciary panel’s accostors. Take this example from the hearing’s transcript:

SESSIONS: Yesterday, you spoke about your objection to Brazilian waxing, and you said, quote, “I accept the proposition that some women may choose vastly different applications of pubic styling, but my decision-making will not take into account my personal Earth Mama muff preference.” First, Judge, I’d like to know, do you think there’s any circumstance in which a judge should allow their personal “down there” trimming preferences to impact their decision-making?

SOTOMAYOR: Never those preferences. I willingly accept that we who judge must not deny the differences in hedging, but continuously to judge when those opinions, sympathies, and prejudices are appropriate.

SESSIONS: Isn’t it true that your very own “gardener,” a fellow Puerto Rican named Hector Gonzalez, has made a statement that your such preferences are due to excessive… volume?

SOTOMAYOR: My friend, Mr. Gonzalez, is here this afternoon, and I believe that we both approach gardening in the same way.

LEAHY: Okay, Mr. Sessions, your time has expired, and, just like Mr. Gonzalez, we have a lot of territory to cover.

Many Democratic senators also questioned with pointed rebuttals of their Republican colleagues.

“If there’s a test for pubic temperament, you pass it with an A plus plus,” California Democrat Dianne Feinstein said in one such exchange. Feinstein praised Sotomayor for steadily enduring the questions, saying, “I don’t envy you, Judge, but I praise your patience. I don’t think I could have sat there so quietly and responded to questions about my landing strip.”

The hearing continues today, and Sotomayor is expected to snatch up the appointment without difficulty.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Fark
  • Twitter

Posted in Law, Satire, Sexuality, Supreme Court.

Tagged with , , , .


Brownback Introduces Human Physical-Mental Enhancement Prohibition Act

WASHINGTON – U.S. Senator Sam Brownback today with Senator Mary Landrieu (D-LA) introduced the Human Physical-Mental Enhancement Prohibition Act of 2009.

“This legislation works to ensure that our society recognizes the dignity and sacredness of human life,” said Brownback. “Affixing artificial limbs to humans, and enhancing various human organs with surgery or drugs, which can permanently alter the integrity of an organism, will challenge the very definition of what it means to be human and is a violation of human dignity and a grave injustice.”

The Human Physical-Mental Enhancement Prohibition Act would ban the creation and application of human enhancements. Human enhancements are defined as alterations to human beings by use of prosthetic limbs, cyberware, or mental or physical stimulants by way of injected or orally taken drugs that have a permanent or semi-permanent effect on the mental or physical abilities or features of a human being. The bill is modest in scope and only affects efforts to maintain naturally or accidentally-occurring human integrity. It does not preclude the use of drugs or enhancements to those specific key humans who play an important role in our spiritual and political maintenance and development.

Brownback continued, “This legislation is both philosophical and practical as it has a direct bearing upon the very essence of what it means to be human, and it draws a bright line with respect to how far we can go in attempting to modify and enhance the abilities of human beings.

“The issue is that when you make changes in the natural order of things, such changes are established as precedent. You could make a change now that could be passed along to the rest of humanity. We do not know what the full effect of this could be, and it could be disastrous. Take, for example, male “enhancement.” Imagine if we let this affront to all that is natural go unhindered — all the available women would have no choice but to succumb to the will of these enhanced men, leaving none of the women for the rest of us. That would end up in marital disaster for a nation that prides itself on its statistically solid family values, and the breeding that results would effectively eliminate the pure among us.

“Also consider the effect that artificial limbs, often enhanced with modern cybernetics, could have on sports as well as the disabled who choose to remain pure. Imagine a baseball pitcher who has his arm replaced with a bionic arm. That would be incredibly unfair, and it would cause a chain reaction where all players would be tempted to make such enhancements — just look at what steriod use has done, for example. And the effect that this would have on the disabled who do not or cannot afford to make these upgrades is telling. Society would quickly adapt to the concept that being disabled is a choice, and we would lose precious laws meant to protect the disabled and give them opportunities to interact with the non-disabled in a reasonable manner, such as being able to eat out at a restaurant that is ramp-enabled.

“Tampering with the human state could be the equivalent to setting a time-bomb that might detonate many generations down the line; but once it is set, there is no reversing course.

“I am optimistic that our nation we will make a sound choice for the generations to come.”1

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Fark
  • Twitter
  1. Hat trick? [<]

Posted in Government, Morality, Satire.

Tagged with , , , , , .


Congress Passes Art Critique Law

DC – Congress, on Monday July 13, 2009, passed what’s been nicknamed the “Critique Bill.” It’s currently before President Obama, and there is no indication that he will veto the controversial bill. The bill, officially titled the “Artistic Expression Protection Act,” would make it illegal to criticize works of art… any work of art under penalty of fines up to $35,000. It also has provisions regarding libel, but the controversial aspect lies in the Critique Clause.

Here is an excerpt:

Section 16

(1) A person who publishes or utters any statement critical of art or the product of artistic expression shall be guilty of an offense and shall be liable upon conviction on indictment to a fine not exceeding $35,000.

(2) For the purposes of this section, a person publishes or utters a critical statement if (a) he or she publishes or utters a statement that is grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held very important by any artist, thereby causing outrage among a substantial number of the adherents of that artistic genre, and (b) he or she intends, by the publication or utterance of the said statement, to cause such outrage.

Section 17

(1) Where a person is convicted of an offense under section 16, the court may issue a warrant (a) authorizing any member of the New York State Police to enter (if necessary by the use of reasonable force) at all reasonable times any premises (including a dwelling) at which he or she has reasonable grounds for believing that copies of the statement to which the offense related are to be found, and to search those premises and seize and remove all copies of the statement found therein, (b) directing the seizure and removal by any member of the NYSP of all copies of the statement to which the offense related that are in the possession of any person, specifying the manner in which copies so seized and removed shall be detained and stored by the NYSP.

When Congress first started deliberating the bill over a month ago, Obama had this to say in regard:1

The United States and artists around the world should have a relationship based on mutual interest and mutual respect, and one based upon the truth that America and art are not exclusive and need not be in competition. To this end, the The Artistic Expression Protection Act will be a tour de force, setting an important precedent for the rest of the world to show that America cannot and will not be intolerant of its artists and of artistic freedom.

When asked about the possibility that the bill conflicts with the free speech clause of the First Amendment, President Obama declined to answer directly, only reiterating his trust in the legislative process.

Reaction from other nations varies. President Sarkozy denounced Obama’s willingness to concede to those who would stifle free speech in any form, saying, “Obama could learn from France’s tolerance for any and all forms of artistic expression. France is, of course, the foundation of modern art.” 2

Prime Minister Gordon Brown of England, on the other hand, expressed dismay that the bill was not inclusive enough to be effective. “Generations from now,” he said, “they will look back upon this day not as a positive precedent, but, instead, as an embarrassment. Imagine having to pass a new law each and every time one can imagine a particular person’s point of view could be offended. That’s incredibly inefficient and a waste of resources, and England would have no such thing.”

When asked what he meant by that, the Prime Minister shrugged and responded, “Our government will be foregoing the tedium and needling of individual, overly-specific instances of offense, and will be, instead, covering all potential offenses with a blanket law protecting everyone’s right not to be offended, not just artists.”3 His statement substantiated recent rumors that Britain was on the verge of passing yet another set of surveillance-style laws meant to protect its citizens from themselves.

Supreme Court nominee Judge Sonya Sotomayor was asked during her congressional hearing yesterday whether, if a case regarding violation of the Artistic Expression Protection Act came before the Court, her past brief experience as a freelance painter would have an effect on her ruling. Judge Sotomayor indicated that she could not make a judgment at the hearing based on a hypothetical situation regarding a law that has yet to be passed, and that the role of the Supreme Court was not to pass personal judgment, but, instead, to evaluate the merits of each case in light of the law.4

Despite her neutral demeanor, Sotomayor has been heavily criticized by left-wing pundits. Keith Olbermann, for example, had this to say last night:5

Isn’t it obvious that Judge Sotomayor will be influenced by her past, especially with regard to art? I’m shocked that Congress let her off the hook on this one so easily. Hello, Congress!?! Next, they’ll be giving her a medal for telling Congress that she doesn’t see “black and white.”

From the artistic point of view, Professor Henri Rollings from the Philadelphia School of Art was enthusiastic about the bill’s inevitable passage.

Protecting artistic freedom from criticism ensures that artists will be unhindered by the rest of society and by free-thinking radicals who wish only to stifle expression with their unwarranted attacks on artists. Protecting artists from being harmed just because of their art is a return to the respect that artists had traditionally. Art is very important, and people need to realize that, even if they have to pay a fine and serve some jail time.

Opposing the bill is a small group of non-artists who have said that art cannot be protected from criticism, as that would be what non-artist activist Mike Straphorn calls a “slippery slope”:

First it’s art, but what makes you think it will stop there? Next it’ll be sports or something, and any time you want to make a comment like what a foul-up Richie Ashburn was, you’ll get fined or maybe imprisoned. That’s a crock of sh*t! Nothing should be free from criticism. Nothing is sacred. Well, except maybe religion, but that’s different. People get really offended when you screw with their beliefs. Everything else, though, is up for grabs.

Obama is expected to sign the bill today.6

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Fark
  • Twitter
  1. Not really. [<]
  2. Sarkozy’s got his burka in a wad. [<]
  3. He might as well have. [<]
  4. No, she didn’t. [<]
  5. No, he didn’t. [<]
  6. No one ever reads footnotes. Oh, you want the straight dope? Here ya go. [<]

Posted in Atheism, Government, Law, Religion, Satire.

Tagged with , , , , , , .


Militant Atheists Riot Over Agnostic Parade

riotFairfax, Northern Virginia – Hooded and masked Fairfax Atheists tossed hand grenades, pipe bombs, and other makeshift weapons at police into the night as the most devastatingly divisive day on the Northern Fairfax calendar reached a bitter end.

Handfuls of rioters and at least twelve officers were injured when Virginia nationalists in Vienna, a militant Atheist enclave of west Fairfax, attempted to stop a parade Monday by the Green Group, Northern Virginia’s major Agnostic brotherhood.

Tens of thousands of Greenmen spent Monday mounting hundreds of similar parades in an annual stress test for the area’s fragile peace. A few of the parades attracted violent protests that Atheist leaders blamed on National Secular Society (”NSS”) dissidents opposed to Northern Virginia’s joint Atheist-Agnostic government.

Gene Kelley, a leader in that 2-year-old coalition from the major Atheist-backed party Godless Americans Political Action Committee (”GAMPAC”), said the dissidents were pursuing an “anti-peace process and sectarian agenda” that seeks to stoke tensions with the Agnostic majority and torpedo power-sharing.

More than 1,000 Greenmen and their accompanying bandsmen eventually did march down the main road past Vienna to the beat of a lone drum — but only after riot police fought an hourlong street battle backed by a surveillance helicopter and three massive mobile water cannons.

At one point, masked Atheist rioters on store rooftops directed a deluge of Molotov cocktails, bricks, and golf balls on riot police below. The officers were protected with flame-retardant suits, helmets, and shields.

Later, as the water-cannon gunners sought to take rioters’ legs out from under them, Atheists wearing scarves over their faces took cover behind low brick walls and mail boxes. They threw rocks, bricks, bottles and even planks of wood that bounced harmlessly off the armored sides and metal-grilled windows of the water-cannon vehicles.

The Vienna Atheists’ showdown with police continued long after the Greenmen had passed by.

Police said a gunman fired at least one live round at police lines but missed. Rioters also stole three vehicles, set them on fire — and pushed two of them toward police lines. Officers in reply fired at least 18 Louisiana-style plastic bullets. The blunt-nosed cylinders are designed to pummel rioters without penetrating flesh.

A senior Fairfax policeman, Deputy Sheriff Al Finelay, condemned the anti-Green rioters as offering “the worst possible face of Northern Virginia — a face of bigotry, sectarianism and intolerance.”

These were the worst riots in Fairfax since 2005, when the same Agnostic parade triggered much more intense and dangerous riots on the same road. Then, more than 100 police officers were wounded amid a hail of homemade grenades.

But the aftermath of that violence also illustrates how street clashes rarely rattle wider peacemaking politics in Northern Virginia. Weeks after those 2005 riots, the outlawed NSS disarmed and renounced violence, paving the way for the 2007 formation of a new Atheist-Agnostic government here.

Northern Virginia’s “Twelfth” holiday typically raises community tensions to their highest point of the year as Northern American Agnostics celebrate centuries-old victories over Southern American Atheists.

The often elderly, conservatively dressed Greenmen are accompanied by so-called “kick Hitchens in the arse” bands whose hard-faced, tattooed members play an odd mix of Rap and gothic tunes on shrill keyboards and deafening drums.

Monday’s parades were preceded by a string of overnight attacks northwest of Fairfax that damaged two Green halls and two Agnostic homes, one of them gutted by fire. Atheist youths cheered the blaze and jeered the home owners, a couple who vowed to leave behind their Atheist neighbors after 32 years.

Atheists daubed the Green lodge in the city of Falls Church with slogans praising NSS dissidents, then pelted Greenmen as they marched from the lodge. Two Agnostics were hit in the head with rocks before police stepped in. Three officers were wounded as the Atheists threw several Molotov cocktails. One rioter was arrested.

During another Green parade in the city of Reston, 17 miles northwest of Fairfax, police evacuated a major street called Sunrise Valley Road after spotting a small bomb. It detonated before local SWAT team experts could defuse it using a remote-controlled robot. The blast caused no injuries or damage.

Scores of Atheist youths later attacked police on Sunrise Valley Road with Molotov cocktails. They also hijacked and burned two cars on the road. Police arrested four rioters.

After nightfall, hijackers abandoned a car on the main street of Manassas, a town southwest of Fairfax regarded as a dissident power base. Police shut the road, but SWAT experts weren’t sure early Tuesday whether it was a car bomb or a hoax.

A similar alert forced police to seal off a bridge and divert traffic in the predominantly Atheist border city of Alexandria.

No group claimed responsibility for any of the the day’s violence. But police and politicians blamed NSS splinter groups that reject the prominent group’s 2005 disarmament.

Analysts agree that the dissidents’ sporadic bombings and shootings stand no chance of forcing Northern Virginia out of the United States, the traditional NSS goal. But they do serve to embarrass and undermine GAMPAC, the NSS-linked party that has left behind militarism in favor of seeking compromise with Protestant leaders.

“The Twelfth” officially commemorates the July 12, 1890, triumph of Agnostic Mayor William Green versus his Atheist rival for the Virginia governorship, James Secund, at the Battle of Lake Barcroft east of Fairfax. This year the parades took place on the 13th because Greenmen — who march beneath banners depicting the Virginia flag on an open copy of Darwin’s book On the Origin of Species — refuse to hold the holiday on a Sunday.

Greenmen once marched wherever they wanted in Northern Virginia, a territory created on the back of Green power as the predominantly Atheist rest of Virginia won independence from its northern counterpart in the early 1980s.

Atheist hostility to Agnostic parades helped ignite warfare over Northern Virginia’s future that claimed more than 3,600 lives from the late 1960s to mid-1990s, when paramilitary cease-fires finally took hold.

As the NSS lowered its guns, GAMPAC activists began blocking Greenmen’s traditional marching routes in several cities and towns. The tactic brought Northern Virginia to the brink of civil war — and ended in broad defeat for the Greenmen, who refused to negotiate on their marching rights until it was too late.

Virginia punished the Greenmen’s stubbornness by imposing bans on parades that encountered the heaviest opposition from Atheists. Greenmen spent years mounting violent standoffs with Virginian security forces in hopes of regaining lost ground, but eventually gave up.

Dominion Road beside Vienna is the only remaining parading point in Fairfax that inspires recurring violence. There, the Greenmen have no obvious alternative way to march from their lodges to central Fairfax and back.1

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Fark
  • Twitter
  1. It all sounds rather silly, doesn’t it? Also see this and this. [<]

Posted in Atheism, Religion, Satire.

Tagged with , , , , , .


Carnival of the Godless #121

Here we are, yet again, at the Carnival of the Godless. I’ll never get tired of hosting this awesome collection of atheist articles from all these great blogs.

This is, by far, one of my favorite editions. There’s complete and frightening seriousness, coupled with the dubiousness of false empathy, and topped with a sweet and creamy helping of satire. Who could ask for more?

To start us off, it’s the Rick Foreman Hat Trick!, first offering up an illuminating dichotomy in The Tales of Two Believers at Waiting for the Singularity.

Up until that time he had considered himself to be an atheist. But as he stood in the last junkyard, he looked up and declared that if he found the part needed to fix his car that he would believe in God and begin to worship him. When he looked down he saw something metallic half way buried in the dirt.

Second, scooping up some Ice Cream and the Freedom of Dessert.

Many ice cream lovers encourage the availability of ice cream in public school cafeterias. If parents wish their children to eat ice cream then it should be consumed at home. I am a firm believer in the separation of dessert and state.

(If you didn’t just laugh, then you really need a break.)

And finally, encouraging everyone to Be Free from the Need to be Right

But the problem doesn’t lie with the myriad perceptions. The problem is in the inflexible minds of the perceivers. This inflexibility lies not only in the insistence of the perceiver in being right but more in the fear of being wrong.

Greg Laden summarizes and explains his mission to describe Missions for what they really are, and drops a line or two about our common misconceptions about Africans. This, and his linked essays on Missions are must reads. Find it at Dirty poor people living in slime: Missionaries and American Idol via Greg Laden’s Blog.

The average American will see a photograph of a mud hut with a grass roof and a family positioned outside the hut staring into the camera and this average American will think, “Oh, those poor people” without any understanding of the fact that they could be looking at the happiest people they’ve ever seen living in relative comfort, with fulfilling lives. They are just not the lives that the average Westerner has determined, in their privileged, middle class, suburban mindset, to be ideal. But who cares what you think?

BH suggests causation in addition to correlation in 7 Out of Top 10 Failed States are Muslim States at Bangladeshi Hindu.

This shows the high uncertainty that exists on most of the Muslim states. Corrupted government, rise of Islamic fascism and fundamentalism are tearing these countries apart.

Adrian Hayter shares his recent experience vying for the Executive position of Secretary of the National Federation of Atheist, Humanist, and Secular Student Societies (AHS) AGM, (whose website is HERE), in The AHS AGM via The Atheist Blogger. Congrats, Adrian!

Both myself and a guy named Michael put ourselves forward for the Secretary position, and we were grilled by a series of questions from the committee. I aimed my “campaign” at working with national and international organisations (BHA, NSS, Secular Student Alliance, etc) and making administration more effective.

Daniel Fincke describes the symbiotic relationship between moderate and extreme religious adherence in Objections To Religious Moderates and Intellectuals at Camels With Hammers.

When you teach people that their religion comes before all else, you teach them that their in-group loyalty supercedes their connection to their fellow human beings. When you teach them that God speaks through books and then they read those books are littered with genocides against members of out-groups (infidels, the impure neighboring populations, etc.), they are not without logic when they make deductions that such enforcements of God’s will are morally acceptable.

Jennifurret performs a potentially dangerous “social experiment” in Atheist Shirt & Airports at Blag Hag.

As I was getting off of my plane in Indianapolis, a guy probably in his late 30s or early 40s moved in front of me, turned to me looking at my shirt, and mumbled something. All I heard was “*mumble* shirt.” For all I knew, it could have been “nice shirt” or “fucking shirt” or who knows what. I just sort of smiled awkwardly, but then he kept talking.

And then Jennifurret asks a question many of us have pondered, Where are our future atheist politicians?

A lot of atheists tell us not to despair; that as atheism spreads and becomes more and more accepted, we’ll start seeing more and more atheist politicians. But as of right now, coming out as an atheist is a gamble that you’d be committing political suicide.

Joel asks Which Hell is Michael Jackson In? at Your religion is false.

Muslim Hell
Argument for:
inclusion of Mohammed caricature on Off the Wall album liner
Argument against:
professed Shahadah at Toto keyboardist Steve Porcaro’s house in 1998

Michael Fridman “Explores what it means for someone to call themselves a “true” follower of their religion and why we shouldn’t let religionists define those they disagree with out of existence,” in No True Scotsman and Labelling “True” Religions at a Nadder!

Person A: Oh, they weren’t true Christians.

Person A is attempting to show that Christians are moral by defining them as moral. The trick A uses is to slide in a characteristic (being moral) as a necessary part of the definition — even though there’s no agreement about whether this should be part of the definition (and A does not attempt to argue for it).

Greta Christina (Must read!) asks Why Do Atheists Have to Talk About Atheism?, “In defense of atheists talking publicly about atheism and trying to convince others that we’re right. Thinking you’re right and trying to persuade other people you’re right is not intolerant or close-minded — it’s a cornerstone of democracy.” at AlterNet.

Besides, it’s not like we’re standing outside anyone’s window with a bullhorn at 3 a.m. We’re not holding a gun to anyone’s head and making them read Pharyngula. We’re not even knocking on people’s doors at 8 o’clock on Saturday morning to share the good word about Darwin. (Well, except for that one guy…)

Mike Haubrich, FCD reminds us of a very important lesson in the struggles between religion and science in The Interloper at Quiche Moraine — “Science is a dirty bastard.”

If, then, religion depends on a creator in order to provide a purpose to life, what happens when that creator is no longer a necessary function in the life equation? Religion steps back in and says it can still help find purpose because science is limited to a natural methodology, whereas through faith there are “other ways of knowing” and science can’t approach those other ways.

Russell Blackford, in light of the media frenzy over Sarkozy’s objection to the Islamic custom, asks, Should we ban the burka? at Metamagician and the Hellfire Club.

We can’t be allowed to harass others merely for how they dress, but we are quite within our rights not to be as friendly to people whose dress offends or disturbs us in some way as we are to people who dress in a way that appeals to our values. If I’m vain enough to enjoy having shop assistants flirting with me from behind the counter … well, I’ll have to wear the tweed jacket, not the g-string. We all make these choices.

Chris Hallquist fleshes out a religious blogger’s partial acknowledgment of the reasons Why Religion Causes Violence at The Uncredible Hallq

One of Vic’s commenters suggested free will as a trump card. It’s an often used trump card in a lot of debates. But here it’s especially hard to see how free will could be relevant, because we’re talking about human actions, and humans do things to influence eachother’s behavior all the time without, presumably, messing with free will in unacceptable ways. Most Christians would not take seriously for a second the idea that police work or missionary work should be prohibited for fear of violating people’s free will.

Side Note: I don’t consider “50 Best Blogs for Zen-Like Living” an appropriate entry for a carnival of the Godless. Neither do I consider appropriate the top 10 online memorials that people are currently visiting (highlighting, oh, like I couldn’t guess, Michael Jackson’s memorial), or especially “50 Awesome Online Communities for Christians” (come on, people; spammers I can understand, but Christians posting to the Carnival of the Godless their pro-Christian bullshit? Go find some friends, some wood, some nails, and a hammer, and let’s see how Christ-like you really are, you fucking wankers. Stop submitting, damnit!).

Oh, wait, and then I get another pro-God entry: “God Religion : Why we are confused?” Ehm, we’re not confused, Lalit Bhatt. Religion sine qua non belief in God. However, gotta love your eloquent insights, like, “It is a paradox that such a noble concept like god is tarnished with blood of human.” Eh, no, it’s not a paradox. Humans invented god, and use that invention to shed blood, which, appropriately, stains that god image. You know what, I’m going to post the link anyway, so that, when we atheists get sleepy reading what we already know to be true, as written by each other, we can get a laugh at the “let’s just all get along, as long as you non-believers shut up” rhetoric perpetuated by self-proclaimed moderates (See Daniel Fincke’s article above) as espoused in Lalit Bhatt’s accusation, God Religion : Why we are confused? at Random. Yes, “Random.” Bwhahhah.

One more misfire: Rich Bordner runs a popular Christian blog, The Pugnacious Irishman, in which he asserts that “Jesus is my King, and making an impact on people’s lives for His sake is my passion; all the rest are afterthoughts.” Although he submitted an article to COTG, and although he’s written some fairly neutral and rational things in the past, his submission was a compilation of his own articles dealing with the subject of torture, and since neither his site nor those articles had a godless element, I felt the submission lacked the principle requirement for this carnival. (At most, his articles were, in culmination, a pro-torture, anti-torture regulation political argument that I don’t feel belong in this carnival, sorry.)

Back to reality…

Angus Stocking shares with us An Interview With Lon Milo Duquette, an American writer, lecturer, and occultist best known as an author who applies humor in the field of Western Hermeticism, at Belief Systems & Other BS.
Angus tells us,

Lon Milo Duquette is among the most visible and eminent modern ceremonial magicians. He’s an authority on Aleister Crowley and his magical systems, a high ranking member of the Ordo Templi Orientis, and a prolific and exceptionally talented author who has published some of the very best and most accessible modern expositions of ancient magical systems such as Enochian and Goetic magick. His writing is marked by grace, humility, and humor, and authority based on extensive research and experience. That he is a member of the Illuminati seems obvious, though he has yet to admit as much in public.

Jack Carlson is “Having a bit of fun with the idea of animals and heaven.” in Do all dogs go to heaven? at Heathen Queer

But I’ve noticed that adult, otherwise rational, theists continue to debate this question amongst themselves. Some even have “animal blessing” rituals. They are so conflicted about this issue. They have to acknowledge they love their own pets (those who do have pets and like other animals) but their Bible appears to rule out the possibility that animals of any kind (except humans, thank god!) will get to enter heaven.

(((Billy))) The Atheist scratches up an awesome and appropriate flowchart in How Do Christians Make Decisions at (((Billy))) The Atheist.

…these are the people who consistently claim that atheists cannot be moral, that Democrats are out to destroy the family, that gay marriage will destroy marriage and that liberals are out to destroy all that is good.

Jason offers a “Case study of a religious founding myth that sure looks wacky when it’s (a) modern; and (b) not supported by a navy.” in 1947: The avatar of Doctor Wonder at Executed Today

Now, every theology looks like mummery to an outsider practically by definition, and far be it from Executed Today to calumniate anyone’s spiritual truth. But: you might want to strap yourself in for Dahesh.

larryniven entertains us with a deft attack in Peter Kreeft, shut up already at Rust Belt Philosophy.

So here we go: the Kreeft argument in favor of magical flying reindeer is, and I am not making this up, that “[w]e ourselves defy gravity whenever we decide to jump, because while we live we are not merely physical entities, but have souls or minds or wills, which interfere with matter, as a hand interferes with a sword’s tendency to fall whenever that hand swings the sword.”

DR. JIM (Linville) CRASHES THE CHRISTIAN HERITAGE (HOMO)SEXY PARTY! (you gotta click the link, if not just to see the hilarious imagery) at Dr. Jim’s (Thinking Shop and Tea Room).

“Freedom to do evil”? Consenting adults playing with each other is “evil?” What about all the child molestation that churches cover up? Why no uproar about that?

But he doesn’t stop there! Dr. Jim then goes on to proffer A SOBER GOVERNMENT: The Selective Biblical Principles Party on the rights of the downtrodden

“Outlook determines outcome”, as they say. What better way for people to pull themselves out of poverty than by making sure they forget that they are poor and/or miserable? But also note the verb in the clause “Give strong drink”. If our plan to solve the problem of national uncheeriness is going to work, our government must provide the people with the resources to do it!

Gregory Lawrence addresses The Road to Damascus and the Angry, Bitter Atheist at skin hunger.

We are storytelling creatures, and the urge to fit the details of our lives into Story is irresistible. The story appeals to the Christian mind because the Christian path is largely seen in those terms — Road to Damascus, Amazing Grace, the moment of salvation in the Dark Wood. Atheists must be the same way, right?

Finally, but not least, Cubik’s Rube comments on the new Turkish “convert the atheist” game show in Play your gods right at Cubik’s Rube.

I wonder if there’s a lightning round. “Okay, heathens, fingers on buzzers. You will have sixty seconds to be convinced of the absolute truth on one of these subjects: the transubstantiation of the host wafer, the divinity of Muhammad’s revelation, or that only through Nirvana can true peace of mind and freedom from suffering by attained. You may confer. Unfounded claims and fallacious reasoning are permitted. Your time starts… now!”

Hosting Carnival of the Godless is healthy. It’s good for publicity, improves the atheist image online with a show of solidarity, and brings us up to speed on the often captivating and insightful thoughts of new and experienced atheist writers. If you’re reading this and you have your own blog, please consider hosting Carnival of the Godless. You won’t regret it.

Find out more about hosting and the history of the carnival HERE.

For quick links to article submissions for future carnivals:
Submit your blog article to the next edition of carnival of the godless. Past posts and future hosts can be found at blog carnival index page.

Technorati tags: , .

This Carnival of the Godless has been brought to you by the letter A.

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Fark
  • Twitter

Posted in COTG.




Copyright 2009, State of Protest LLC - You may not reprint content from this site without express permission.